Just a fun, somewhat terrifying read

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Actuall, no. If a VM can be broken, how come everyone goes on about things being perfectly safe to run in one?

        It gives people like me a false sense of security.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Exactly. And you can see by the number of upvotes your comment got vs the number of downvotes earned by mine that a false sense of security is shared by the majority.

    • slazer2au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14 months ago

      VM does not mean it is safe. There is malware out there that can break the sandbox and infect the hypervisor

        • slazer2au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          It’s XP, there are likely several unpatched escaping bugs with free POC out there. You don’t need anything new.

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            204 months ago

            Surely breaking out of a VM requires exploiting a vulnerability of the VM, not of the OS running in it?

            • slazer2au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44 months ago

              I would assume it requires both a hypervisor and guest OS bug to be tripped.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                44 months ago

                It’s pure speculation, but I assume you’ll need

                1. Enough access to the guest OS so that you can interact directly with the virtual hardware. That would probably require root access, so you’ll probably need to exploit some bug in the guest OS to get there.
                2. To break out of the vm, you’ll then need to exploit a bug in the virtual hardware. You would want to get the hypervisor to execute arbitrary code.
                3. If you want to infect the host OS, then you’ll need sufficient access on the host. If the hypervisor doesn’t run with sufficient privileges, you’ll have to exploit a bug in the host as well to perform a privilege escalation. But I’m guessing the hypervisor will usually have sufficient privileges, so exploiting the host is probably not necessary.

                Sounds like quite a bit of work, but I don’t see why malware couldn’t automate it. An up-to-date hypervisor should help reduce the risk though.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  54 months ago

                  Theres no way an hypervisor zero day gets implemented in some random Malware. Those are worth millions and are used in coordinated manual attacks against VIP targets

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    Yeah a zero-day would be very unlikely, but a months-old, publically known and patched vulnerability could always be attempted. One of the reasons why the hypervisor should definitely be kept up-to-date. There is always someone who forgets to patch their software, why not give it a try? We’re talking about a Windows XP scenario after all!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                14 months ago

                It’s XP. There’s guaranteed to be a way to go from userland to ring 0 code execution.