• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1064 months ago

    So basically the corporate equivalent of slipping a traffic cop a $100, then him conveniently deciding that you’re free to go.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      194 months ago

      More like saying to the judge “What’s the max you can charge me? Alright, here’s the money, let’s skip the court bullshit.” in this case.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -34 months ago

        Mm… no. It’s really not.

        The specific point of all of this was that Google wanted to avoid a jury trial, and the specific reason that they wanted to avoid a jury trial is because a jury trial is much more likely to end up with a much bigger judgment against them. A judge in a bench trial will follow established precedent to arrive at a reasonable penalty, while a jury can and often will essentially arbitrarily decide that they should be fined eleventy bajillion dollars for being assholes.

        So their goal with this payment was pretty much exactly the same as the goal of the motorist who slips a traffic cop a bribe to get out of a ticket - to entice someone with immediate cash in order to avoid potentially having to pay much more somewhere down the line.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          64 months ago

          Except it’s not a bribe. It’s entirely above-board, the money they’re paying is a fine. They’re not “getting out of a ticket”, they’re paying the ticket.

    • CALIGVLA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      One has to wonder why corporations are fined such low amounts, in a just world these big corps would be fined in the tens of billions at the lowest.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        Because the low amount is the just amount minus what they paid to the people making decisions.