Track_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 15 hours agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1682arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1674arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 15 hours agomessage-square92fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•12 hours agoPretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•5 hours agoIt’s actually English for “I’m so sneaky I found a way to bait people into commenting on my post”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•5 hours agoThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-227 minutes agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•edit-211 hours agoPlural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•10 hours agoI think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•3 hours agoThey apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out Generated?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•edit-29 hours ago“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
Genera?
Have, you lost Ted?
Genre.
it’s very much ai,
generation?
Pretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
It’s actually English for “I’m so sneaky I found a way to bait people into commenting on my post”.
nope. it’s the plural.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.
Yeah…no it isn’t.
I think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
They apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out
“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).