Track_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 15 hours agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1680arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1672arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 15 hours agomessage-square92fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•12 hours agoPretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•5 hours agoIt’s actually English for “I’m so sneaky I found a way to bait people into commenting on my post”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•5 hours agoThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-225 minutes agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Pretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
It’s actually English for “I’m so sneaky I found a way to bait people into commenting on my post”.
nope. it’s the plural.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.