• magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not like it’s going to consume electricity like Bitcoin.

      PoW was first conceptualized as an anti spam method. It’s just a little overhead to make it expensive to make DOS attacks. This makes perfect sense.

    • delirious_owl@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      What do you think PoW was created for. This is exactly the use case of PoW – to reduce malicious traffic. It works great!

    • ziviz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      At least it appears to be something that gets triggered. In theory, if a node is not under attack or heavy usage, this isn’t a consideration. Doesn’t seem to be a perfect solution as it still slows the traffic of legitimate users in the event of an attack. I don’t know the full details, but in the worse case it makes it easier to semi-DoS, maybe not by fully making a node unresponsive, but by making the service so painfully slow that users may give up on it.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Only for those users who do not have proof of work capability, they get put at the back of the line, but anybody with proof of work capability, which was released last August, will do the work and be put higher priority. I know some people who run seed nodes for Haveno-reto and they had major DDOS issues until they got PoW enabled. It was taking like 5 or 10 minutes to get connected to the network. And now it takes about 30 seconds.