• const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    No idea why people use and recommend Brave when Firefox exists. It’s full of crypto and other unnecessary add-ons out of the box.

    • medium_adult_son [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since it is based on Chromium, but promises to keep the new Google tracking out in the future and maintain compatibility with extensions, I can see why it would be recommended. But only as a backup to access a site that won’t load in Firefox.

      we’re back to the days when Firefox first came out, except instead of some websites only working with IE, they’ll only work in Chrome/Edge.

    • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Firefox still doesn’t have vertical tabs which I’ve found really useful for my workflow right now, so I use a fork called Pulse. Don’t want to use any extensions for it when Pulse and other forks do it natively.

      • ferralcat@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a million add-ons that add this, isn’t there? I have one installed at home that basically makes it into what arc has

        • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Probably, but between the disabling of userChrome.css (even if you can enable it via about:config) and a possible conflict between other addons I use, I’m comfy with my Pulse setup.

      • Reborn2966@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        sorry, why not tree style tabs?

        you can hide the normal tab bar and only have the tree style ones on the side

        • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I explain it in another comment, tl;dr: have to edit userChrome.css to give it a more streamlined look (and Mozilla calls that feature “legacy” in about:config since v69 which kinda worries me about that feature’s removal) and I’m not sure if some extensions might conflict (Would it have issues with Simple Tab Groups). Pulse does it natively and really well, so I’m happy with it.

      • dejf@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know it’s most likely not relevant with you anymore, since you’re using Pulse, but have you tried any of the vertical/tree tab extensions?

        • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I used Tree Style Tab but I didn’t like having to change the userChrome.css to make it streamlined (i.e. hiding the tab bar), while Pulse does it natively and really well. I do have an extension for tab groups that imitates Vivaldi’s tab workspaces though, not sure if those will conflict. (If you’re curious, it’s called Simple Tab Groups.)

          Edit: There’s also the issue of Mozilla calling the editable userChrome.css a legacy feature, which kinda worries me about its possible removal. Pulse having vertical tabs as a native feature skips that.

    • Kayn@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave has marketed itself more aggressively than Firefox did.

      Additionally, Firefox’ most devoted userbase can be quite bitter at times.

      • Still
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        that is because all browsers on iOS are basically safari cuz Apple doesn’t allow fun

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Orion apparently allows extensions like uBlock Origin. Not sure if anyone has put it to the test but superficially, its there. Hard to tell where Orion ends and uBlock Origin begins since it seems adept at dealing with fingerprinting and other niceties by itself

          • ferralcat@monyet.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can’t download and run code on iOS, which is pretty much the definition of an extension. You could ship some extensions “with” your browser, but at that point they’re just a feature. iOS has adblocking addons at the system level though, doesn’t it?

            • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ya, the extension aspects of iOS are a headache in terms of understanding everything. I look forward to liberalisation of 3rd party browsers allowed and any consequent innovation on mobile browsing.

    • Praeceptorem666@relyma.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      Says it comes with unnecessary add-ons Comes with 0 unnecessary add-ons

      Bravephobes are now just making shit up Lol

      • const_void@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago
        • Brave Rewards
        • Brave Talk
        • Brave Search
        • Brave News
        • Brave Wallet

        Yeah, such a light and lean browser…

        • Praeceptorem666@relyma.club
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          31
          ·
          1 year ago

          All of that Firefox has its equivalents as well as some of that being untrue as they’re search engines not websites etc

          • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Brave has adware and bloat preinstalled, firefox doesn’t even have something similar to this.

              • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why are you gaslighting so hard. Just lookup what adware is. It has literally preinstalled crypto marketing widget that you need to disable or smth and also provide a opt-in ads for crypto solution that has opt-out “Gift the tokens to the page that has no wallet”

                • Praeceptorem666@relyma.club
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  When one makes a claim like that when nothing indicated such things, its accepted in the community of behavioral analysis that it was a projection. Bravephobes love making shit up Lol

            • Praeceptorem666@relyma.club
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              BR = Ads like all browsers except off by default and it pays you

              BT = Nothing, not part of the browser

              BS = That’s just a fucking search engine. What browser doesn’t come with one Lol

              BW = FF also has “bloat” like phishing protection except the wallet is actually useful and isn’t just a censorship tool