• jasory
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you literally not know what ethics is? You’ve acted like a complete and total moron in every reply on this post.

    You realise you can sum your position to

    If someone desires something

    Then we should grant it despite any prohibition on active killing, ( presumably so long as it does not harm an individual other than the subject)

    But this isn’t actually accepted by virtually anyone, see suicidality for temporary conditions or just the fact that we have no apparent obligation to grant something based on mere desire.

    The entire pro-euthanasia argument relies on basing moral principles on wildly variable emotions and sympathy.

      • jasory
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very convenient to whine about strawmen when you absolutely refuse to formalise your argument. I too can assume telepathy on the side of my critics, and then accuse them of strawmanning even though I flatly refuse to actually correct them despite having 3 opportunities.

        This isn’t you being a giga-brain genius, it’s you failing basic intellectual standards that a 9-year old could meet.