They’re assuming (probably correctly) that a lot of people under 28 won’t vote, and that (probably less correctly) they’d vote Democrat if they did vote. So if Trump wins and they pass a random 28 year old on the street, they’re thinking there’s a good chance that person is partially responsible for Trump’s win.
under the age of 28 ?
It makes extra sense because it includes ages 0-17
I am still lost
Votes for people 0-17 count double so they should vote extra hard.
No I don’t have any idea what they’re talking about either.
😂
They’re assuming (probably correctly) that a lot of people under 28 won’t vote, and that (probably less correctly) they’d vote Democrat if they did vote. So if Trump wins and they pass a random 28 year old on the street, they’re thinking there’s a good chance that person is partially responsible for Trump’s win.
Appreciate the clarification
Removed by mod
Ok that makes more sense thanks. 28 seemed very arbitrary but if the statistics say so…