@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 months agomeasuring rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square281fedilinkarrow-up11.38Karrow-down13
arrow-up11.38Karrow-down1imagemeasuring rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square281fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•10 months agoNot nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoI WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•10 months agoOh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoCope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-210 months agoOof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?
Not nearly as hard as you are working to represent F in chat about personal preference
I WILL die on this hill. But preference is just what you do with the information, not the usefulness of the scale. 0-100 is the scale. Whether you wear jackets at 50-60 or 60-70 doesn’t mean that the scale isn’t objectively better.
Oh yea I think I do agree with you that the C scale is objectively better.
Cope harder. F is objectively better for environment. C is objectively better for scientific calculation
Oof you really trying to get others to die on that hill with ya huh?
You’re objectively dumb