• MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Over a 25-year period, though, methane is 85 times worse for the climate than carbon dioxide.

    Doesn’t it get reduced in the athmosphere in about 5 years to mostly CO2?

    • huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes but the heat it retains in that time is 85x the effect of base CO2, which makes sense: decomposition of the methane releases energy. It does a much better job of reflecting the IR until it breaks down, then in the act of breaking down releases energy.

    • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      The atmospheric half life of methaine is just under 10 years. So if you release 1k lbs of methaine in 10 years there will be 500 lbs left 10 years after that ther will be 250 ect.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          1k lbs is a perfectly cromulent unit of enbiggenment, colloquially known as “Calebs”.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Indeed that’s 10 hundredweight. Which maybe ironically enough is rather intuitive for me, Germany still uses pounds and hundredweight (Zentner) in informal and sectorial use, meaning 500g and 50kg.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I mean, it’s more clear than 0.5 tons, since “tons” doesn’t specify US or metric. Not that it would matter in this specific instance.

          • lad
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            But if it doesn’t matter, what’s the problem with tons?

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It’s complicated. The breakdown of methane in the atmosphere depends on hydroxyl radicals that are created at a regular rate. If you have more and more methane released, and/or you have other chemicals that also react with those radicals, the overall average half life will increase. Both those things are happening, so the old half life really isn’t as accurate as it used to be. Guess which number the IPCC still uses for its models though.

        • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Goddam Hydroxl Radicals keep sending drones to attack US ships! Iran needs an ass-kicking!