If the reason someone is attracted to a woman is because that woman looks like a child, then yes. If someone thinks the childlike woman is attractive for other qualities, then the woman is coincidentally childlike in that relationship. In the previous example, a relationship only occurs because she looks like a child. That is bad.
There’s a subtle difference between starting a relationship because someone looks like a child and starting a relationship despite her looking like a child.
Since the context is Hatsune Miku being a loli, and the only childlike traits she has being small tits (sometimes), I used it as an example.
But also, there is no absolute definition of what a loli is. Being short and flatchested is enough for some to label the character a loli, even if said character is an adult. And a character can be in middle school but still not be considered a loli. The actual age of the character is not generally important in labelling the character a loli. It is a body type.
Ah so we’re going with the “there’s no clear definition” argument. I know you know what I mean because no one takes the time to say:
“Nowadays people will call you a pedophile on extwitter for liking an image of a clothed Hatsune Miku.”
You know what I’m talking about because no one would care if you said a character like Kiyomi Takada from Death Note was clothed or not. But you made it crystal clear that you meant clothed because there would be something very wrong otherwise. You can have the last word if you want man, all of you guys are just making excuses for yourselves.
I added clothed because it adds to the absurdity. Hatsune Miku to begin with is not a loli, and there is nothing wrong with feeling sexual attraction towards her.
For someone to see her and think “pedophiles jerk off to this” on top of for some reason feeling the need to sexualize her despite her being clothed is the weird shit you see on extwitter.
There are irl women who look like lolis do, should one be called a pedophile for being attracted to them?
Loli =/= child
(I don’t care for Loli myself but let’s not label people an extreme thing off of 0 evidence)
If the reason someone is attracted to a woman is because that woman looks like a child, then yes. If someone thinks the childlike woman is attractive for other qualities, then the woman is coincidentally childlike in that relationship. In the previous example, a relationship only occurs because she looks like a child. That is bad.
There’s a subtle difference between starting a relationship because someone looks like a child and starting a relationship despite her looking like a child.
The way you phrase it makes it sound like anyone who prefers small tits is a pedo, and “normal” people only like big tits, but tolerate small ones.
Pedophilia is bad because it is a rape fetish, not because of body shapes, and you’re not a pedo for preferring one shape over the other.
And you’re being disingenuous. If you google search “loli” it’s definitely not just someone with small tits.
Since the context is Hatsune Miku being a loli, and the only childlike traits she has being small tits (sometimes), I used it as an example.
But also, there is no absolute definition of what a loli is. Being short and flatchested is enough for some to label the character a loli, even if said character is an adult. And a character can be in middle school but still not be considered a loli. The actual age of the character is not generally important in labelling the character a loli. It is a body type.
Ah so we’re going with the “there’s no clear definition” argument. I know you know what I mean because no one takes the time to say:
“Nowadays people will call you a pedophile on extwitter for liking an image of a clothed Hatsune Miku.”
You know what I’m talking about because no one would care if you said a character like Kiyomi Takada from Death Note was clothed or not. But you made it crystal clear that you meant clothed because there would be something very wrong otherwise. You can have the last word if you want man, all of you guys are just making excuses for yourselves.
I added clothed because it adds to the absurdity. Hatsune Miku to begin with is not a loli, and there is nothing wrong with feeling sexual attraction towards her.
For someone to see her and think “pedophiles jerk off to this” on top of for some reason feeling the need to sexualize her despite her being clothed is the weird shit you see on extwitter.
There really isn’t, just reads like you are one of those that call preferences “fetish”, I’m allowed to not find skinny people attractive.
Google “loli” and tell me that’s something you’re okay with full-grown adults being attracted to and that it’s a “preference.”