• @MadhuGururajan
    link
    116 months ago

    Why is the greed of the owner class often conveniently dropped or forgotten in such discussions then? You think billionaires need their billions?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -4
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      No.

      The vast majority of first-worlders complaining about not having enough money already have more than people whose needs are not being met.

      The problem is that they think they should get more before others who have less. It’s an issue that exists all the way to the top, which is why it’s hypocritical to call out billionaires while not looking at our own contributions to the problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        In the end, the entire world is in poverty while 2000 people are rich beyond their wildest dreams.

        Its awfully dismissive to pull the “starving kids in China” card

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Uhh, no. My entire point was people conflating needs with wants and you’re doing just that.

          “Living in poverty compared to billionaires” is not the same as starving.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -1
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Yeah, those with food insecurity should get more before those without it.

              The problem is, some people conflate “I can’t afford to eat out everyday” with “needing more money.” No. Just because you have to cook your own meals doesn’t mean your needs aren’t being met.

              You can buy a pound of bologna for $1.50 at Walmart, for example. But the people I’m referring to are “too good” for that. They believe they should get more before others who have less. Are you one of them?