• Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, socks can turn into a lot of data really fast, especially if they are multithreaded. Which is why I only use single threaded socks to protect my dataplan.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Given that one sperm has 27.5 MB of data (which means each orgasm has over 7 petabytes of information!) I think we can safely assume which socks his washer is transmitting.

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Given that one sperm has 27.5 MB of data (which means each orgasm has over 7 petabytes of information!)

        Redundancy!

        • XTL@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I believe that fluids don’t, in general, compress. But maybe the trick is turning them to digital data first and then redundancy makes them very compressible.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The info in each sperm is effectively identical, so it’s still only 27.5 MB of data in the whole thing, just with a lot of redundancy for error detection / correction.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m sure they’re being downloaded to Russia and then sold back to the west to finance the war!