• RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    9 months ago

    I had a client once who used to be obsessed with this. By his logic, if a potential customer visited the website and had a bad experience because the site didn’t work properly in their browser, they’d think the company was unprofessional and wouldn’t come into the store and we’d lose them as a customer forever. Analytics showed that 99+% of people would visit in one of the big three, and he wouldn’t pay for someone to test the site on the less popular browsers, instead he insisted on fingerprinting logic that broke all the time and probably caused more bounces than any possible rendering quirks from niche mobile browsers would have caused

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s ridiculous some people even consider blocking a browser completely and having a near 100% chance of turning away the customer that uses it instead of just letting the user browse and have a significant chance of nothing bad happening.

      People are not going to change browsers to visit this website unless they absolutely have to - in which case they’ll hate this company for it.

      • BetterDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh my god, you get it. Thank you for your continued existence. Keep going!