I don’t think it’s necessarily support. But if actions have no consequences then there’s no reason not to? Not that it’s a good argument but it’s apparently reality
No, this is consistent with Bruen. The meat of Bruen was that it prohibited subjective “suitability” criteria in permitting. You’re only allowed to use objective criteria, like having training or not having a criminal record. States can still require permits for gun ownership.
This guy is an idiot and it was only a matter of time before he went to prison, deservedly. I highly doubt that he was carrying for any reasonable purpose.
States can ignore SCOTUS rulings now.
I’m surprised to see so many people supporting the actions of Gov. Abbott.
I don’t think it’s necessarily support. But if actions have no consequences then there’s no reason not to? Not that it’s a good argument but it’s apparently reality
Maybe “accepting” would have been a better choice? I don’t know.
What are they supposed to do about it? The average person can’t afford to take a day off to protest.
Clearly. I guess this is the country now. Supreme Court rulings are optional unless the President decides to send in troops to enforce it.
No, this is consistent with Bruen. The meat of Bruen was that it prohibited subjective “suitability” criteria in permitting. You’re only allowed to use objective criteria, like having training or not having a criminal record. States can still require permits for gun ownership.
This guy is an idiot and it was only a matter of time before he went to prison, deservedly. I highly doubt that he was carrying for any reasonable purpose.