• NaN
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Oracle for ages, and Red Hat had made changes in the last to make it more difficult for Oracle (something about the kernel patches).

    Rocky more recently, CIQ had been selling support contracts, including a well publicized contract at NASA very recently for a few workstations.

    If it was just AlmaLinux making a free clone I’m not sure if they would have made the change or not. Obviously they got rid of the original CentOS so it might have still been on their minds. Also, they were doing a lot of packaging and debranding work to enable this that was no benefit to Red Hat, so it may have been a matter of deciding the cost and resources was more than they could justify, especially when it is essentially putting the code in yet another, third place (Stream, customer SRPMs, the git site).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      There’s no way this change stops Oracle, though. Oracle will continue doing whatever they want and the consumers can abandon hope, all ye who enter into contracts with Oracle. (The fact that this is all Rocky and Alma and nobody was talking about going to Oracle after Red Hat killed CentOS should be a sign.)

      Anyway point is, Red Hat can cry about Rocky and Alma all they like but if those two had the same institutional backing as Oracle they’d shut up quick. They just think they can get away with preventing small fries from exercising their rights under the GPL.