@[email protected] to [email protected] • 4 months agoBernie Sanders unveils 32-hour workweek bill with no loss in pay for workersthehill.comexternal-linkmessage-square312fedilinkarrow-up11.62Karrow-down124cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.6Karrow-down1external-linkBernie Sanders unveils 32-hour workweek bill with no loss in pay for workersthehill.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square312fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareCosmic Clericlinkfedilink0•4 months agoDo you think the joke matched the comment it was replying to, which was about calling your house representative?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•4 months agoIt’s what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits.
minus-squareCosmic Clericlinkfedilink1•4 months ago It’s what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits. Fair enough, and that’s the answer I was looking for. The majority of the comment was about contacting your house representative, but you’re right, it could match the first sentence, I guess. I kind of wished they would have quoted that first sentence as part of their reply with the joke, to save me some time in replying.
minus-squareCosmic Clericlinkfedilink1•edit-24 months ago lighten up Not a matter of lightening up, its a matter of trying to understand, as it seems like such a non sequitur. Is it really so hard to believe that somebody would want to know why somebody replied to them in such a perceived strange and unrelated sort of way?
Do you think the joke matched the comment it was replying to, which was about calling your house representative?
It’s what a wealthy conservative business owner might say upon reading the first sentence of your comment, I think it fits.
Fair enough, and that’s the answer I was looking for.
The majority of the comment was about contacting your house representative, but you’re right, it could match the first sentence, I guess.
I kind of wished they would have quoted that first sentence as part of their reply with the joke, to save me some time in replying.
It’s a cynical statement, lighten up
Not a matter of lightening up, its a matter of trying to understand, as it seems like such a non sequitur.
Is it really so hard to believe that somebody would want to know why somebody replied to them in such a perceived strange and unrelated sort of way?