Shuttering of New York facility raises awkward climate crisis questions as gas – not renewables – fills gap in power generation

When New York’s deteriorating and unloved Indian Point nuclear plant finally shuttered in 2021, its demise was met with delight from environmentalists who had long demanded it be scrapped.

But there has been a sting in the tail – since the closure, New York’s greenhouse gas emissions have gone up.

Castigated for its impact upon the surrounding environment and feared for its potential to unleash disaster close to the heart of New York City, Indian Point nevertheless supplied a large chunk of the state’s carbon-free electricity.

Since the plant’s closure, it has been gas, rather then clean energy such as solar and wind, that has filled the void, leaving New York City in the embarrassing situation of seeing its planet-heating emissions jump in recent years to the point its power grid is now dirtier than Texas’s, as well as the US average.

  • towerful
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Also, dont coal plant spew out loads of radiation?

    • greyw0lv@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not loads per say, but the workers are exposed to more radiation than a nuclear reactor operator would be.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        and the public, birds, animals, wildlife, anything outside potentially. (realistically most of it should be scrubbed but uh…)