• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      Ah yes, as a response to intelligent analysis, here is a meme.

      The height of politics online… 14 year old boys yelling “nuh uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!”…

      • @zero_spelled_with_an_ecks
        link
        -53 months ago

        I’m 15 at least, maybe even 15 and a half.

        But fine, from the article:

        What might alter this perspective Any number of factors might derail China’s growth, even in the short term, including war over Taiwan, mismanagement of the Chinese economy linked to its poor Governance rating, and further attempts by America to reduce trading links with China.

        So as long as nothing unexpected happens, yeah, the graph will keep going as it has been. Great article, well worth a much better response than I gave it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 months ago

          You can read the other responses. They have references.

          You’ll be reminded of this when China’s GDP is officially twice Americas.

          • @zero_spelled_with_an_ecks
            link
            03 months ago

            Is that supposed to be menacing, being reminded? And if it becomes twice America’s, their population is currently more than three times America’s, so it’s not the brag you seem to think it is. Not that GDP is how countries should measure their economic dicks anyway.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              33 months ago

              It’s a big deal when their PPPGDPPC in 1950 was 50 USD. In 1990 they were poorer per capita than Afghanistan, Cambodia, DR Congo, Ghana, Haiti, India, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan, The Philippines, Sudan, Zimbabwe. Both where they were then and also where they are now in the cases where they’ve gotten poorer.

    • Pili
      link
      fedilink
      13 months ago

      Because it is know that GDP growth is a one time thing.