@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agoneptunemander.xyzimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1615arrow-down15
arrow-up1610arrow-down1imageneptunemander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 5 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish53•5 months agothere are many things besides pixel count. i bet it was a hell of a 0.6mp camera to be able to snap that good of a pic of a planet literally in the middle of space
minus-square@onlinepersonalinkEnglish17•5 months agoProbably a very good lens. If there’s no digital zoom and little digital correction, then quality can be quite good despite low pixel count. Anti Commercial-AI license
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•5 months agoPhotography advice threads: “zoom with your feet!” Scientists: “…ok.”
there are many things besides pixel count.
i bet it was a hell of a 0.6mp camera to be able to snap that good of a pic of a planet literally in the middle of space
Probably a very good lens. If there’s no digital zoom and little digital correction, then quality can be quite good despite low pixel count.
Anti Commercial-AI license
Photography advice threads: “zoom with your feet!”
Scientists: “…ok.”