This article scrutinizes the notion of competition between real women and AI “girlfriend” platforms, which are being increasingly documented by various media outlets. The core argument posits that real women cannot genuinely compete with AI counterparts because the essence and existence of a real woman—encompassing her physicality, sexuality, and humanity—cannot be paralleled by computer simulations. The discussion highlights the absurdity of comparing living beings with virtual entities, underscoring that such comparisons are shallow due to the vast differences between reality and virtual reality.

The critique extends to the societal implications of viewing women as competitors against virtual counterparts, suggesting that this perspective diminishes the intrinsic value and humanity of women. It challenges the notion of equality between women and algorithms, emphasizing the unique qualities of human existence, such as sensation, will, and imagination, which algorithms lack. Furthermore, it points out the irony in an era that claims to advance women’s equality, yet entertains the idea of AI girlfriends, thereby negating the progress in recognizing women’s humanity.

The article concludes on a reflective note, suggesting that if one acknowledges existence as a victory and competition as only meaningful among equals, then real women inherently triumph over any AI “rival.” It calls for a recognition of women’s humanity, implicitly critiquing movements that fail to convince of the inherent value and dignity of women beyond superficial comparisons.

Summarized by ChatGPT