Sheriff Ruben Nolasco won re-election despite pressure from victims’ families to step down and a Justice Department report finding ‘cascading’ failures among the law enforcement response that day

For nearly two years, a Texas county sheriff has refused to step down after a gunman killed 19 children and two teachers at Robb Elementary School in 2022.

Instead, on Super Tuesday, Uvalde County sheriff Ruben Nolasco faced voters for the first time in the wake of the massacre.

And he won re-election with roughly 39 per cent of votes against three Republican challengers, according to preliminary results.

The sheriff has repeatedly rebuffed calls to resign or withdraw his candidacy for re-election despite overwhelming public pressure from victims’ families, demands that he face criminal charges, and a federal investigation that detailed a minute-by-minute timeline exposing “cascading” failures in the law enforcement response that day.

    • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      115
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s still an embarrassing amount of ppl wanting an incompetent failure running the sheriff department

    • derf82@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nope, in a rural Texas county, the Republican primary is for all intents and purposes the general.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Remember how soon after the massacre, Uvalde county overwhelmingly voted to re-elect Abbot?

      These people don’t care about their own children

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        The parents of the actual children cared enough to campaign against them… But as for the rest of the voters: it isn’t their kids.

        America is the world capital of “rugged individualism,” and it’s basically Texas’ whole schtick. These people don’t give a shit until it happens to them. Like directly to them.

    • mr_robot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Was there nobody else willing to stand up and do the job? Even someone in the same party, with the same principles should be able to look at an assessment of the Sheriff’s department’s actions and realize a leadership change is necessary for the general safety of the community.

      If you are a conservative living in Uvalde, Texas with a couple of kids, wouldn’t you want the peace of mind to know the local Sheriff’s office is under new management?

      I wouldn’t feel safe having my kid in school with that guy in charge.

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I’ve said it before, Uvalde had a chance to bring about change and they immediately voted Abbott back in and their community reelected the same sheriffs and judges who did nothing while their kids died. After a point my sympathy is used to for these people, if they don’t care about their own kids and community, why should I?

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Republicans have repeatedly proven that dead kids are a price they’re willing to pay if it means they don’t have to elect a democrat.

      Every school shooting ever is proof of that. They want to keep that barrier against gun control in place at any price.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        The victims of Republican policies deserve no sympathy because they committed the sin of being outnumbered?

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          No, because there is only so much compassion someone can have before needing to become practical.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Republicans’ victims are disposable so long as they’re stuck in red states. Loud and clear.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                I live in Texas, so I deserve to be mistreated because I’m outnumbered, according to you.

                • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Bruh I live in Texas too, and the second that Abbott was re-voted in, in 2022, after the 6 week “Heartbeat Bill”, AND he took Uvalde after his “Coulda Been Worse” comments, that’s when I was like “To hell with this fucking state.”

                  I vote in every election, even for the piddly local shit, but I do not expect change, and the second that I’m able to, I’m out.

                  You can only expect people to have compassion for those of us residing in deep red states for so long. Abbott was a popular vote. And he won by a lot.

                  I’m trying to remain hopeful/optimistic for Allred. I really do think he can usher in an Era of change.

                • stoly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  You’re toxic and deserve to be blocked by me, which I am doing now. Grow up and stop proving my point.

      • piskertariot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        As a Canadian who lives in Alberta, this pains me.

        I despise our provincial government. I vote in every election. I reach out to my electors who I disagree with. And it doesn’t matter because a bunch of old “got mine” boomers rich on oil money, keep voting in their shitty friends who are looting the public in plain view.

        Why don’t I move? Because the whole fucking world seems to be going this way, and the housing market is insane.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is also why it’s worth living in a place like Vancouver or San Francisco. Yes it’s expensive but you’re safe and will be respected by the people around you.

    • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s infuriating.

      How can you live in that community and be happy with this as an outcome?

      Zero accountability for anyone with the blood of literal children on their hands but I’m sure they’ll go after the corrupting influence of ‘woke’ Democrats.

      • harderian729@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Texans are some of the most delusional people on the planet.

        Once you realize this, a lot of their behaviors start to make sense.

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can’t do anything for their kids. They can. And they won’t and don’t care.

        Me supporting their kids is nothing but empty words.

    • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because their police standards and practices are, by and large, our deep blue city police standards and practices. Some minor differences sure but you transplant people from one department to another and they’ll fit right in.

    • harderian729@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, there is no helping Texans at this point.

      The only solution is to leave and let them implode on their own.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    9 months ago

    If we could just declare schoolchildren to be embryos, Republicans might consider their lives to have value and be worth protecting.

    • troglodytis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nope.

      In Alabama, as soon as the Republicans realized their craziness impacted their own lives, changing the rules became the top priority of the state. They are doing a perfect job of showing us they could do their jobs super efficiently, but have zero desire to.

      Also, their workaround will protect the businesses and the doctors, but not the patients.

      Cruelty to the ‘others’ is the point.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why are positions like Sheriff and Coroner elected? Shouldn’t they be appointed/hired based on ACTUAL FUCKING QUALIFICATIONS and experience?

    • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because they are left over from the 1800’s and people are too stupid to fix it.

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not stupid, just they know they can use the shitty system to their advantage.

    • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It makes them independent of the mayor, who appoints the police chief and is effectively in control of the police department (if the chief doesn’t cooperate with them they’ll appoint a new one). The mayor is just as likely to be corrupt as the sheriff, so having 2 separate law enforcement agencies that are able to investigate each other seems like a good idea. In an ideal situation they’d keep each other honest.

      Checks and balances…

      • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Same with coroner. Let’s say you have a corrupt mayor and corrupt police department that would really like it if the coroner reported some deaths to be suicide or of natural causes.

        But when everyone is in the same political party and colluding anyways, it doesn’t really work.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        How do coroner run anyways? Like…what are their platforms?

        I promise to provide accurate information about the cause of death.

        Yeah, me too.

      • jeremyparker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Interestingly, basically no one has any checks on sheriffs. We can “vote them out” but that’s extremely difficult, and sheriffs can interfere with they’re competitors with no consequences.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The police department can investigate them. Do you think there are more checks on the mayor?

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Many counties the sheriff is the primary elected official. They are generally the local executive, outside of cities that are largely enough to need a more formal government.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      What happens when a system that only works with an educated, engaged, and intellectually honest population starts attacking education, engagement, and honesty?

      Good things, surely.

      • extant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        In this case I think it’s more the indifference of voters without children or sympathy to those who do don’t care as long as they aren’t affected.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Republicans care about kids SO MUCH that they’ll HAPPILY REELECT someone who allowed 19 Schoolchildren to be GUNNED DOWN!