Hard to tell from the pictures. Based on them alone I’d vote for one of the pointier beach houses.
It’s a bit disappointing how many of the private dwellings are elegant sheds.
Do you know the criteria? I don’t know much about architecture, is it about houses that are technically impressive or that look the best?
Also asking @[email protected]
From the NZIA About the awards programme (which took me a bit to find):
The awards judges assess each project in terms of the following:
The relationship of the building to its site, context and presence
The degree of consistency and completeness in expressing the relationship between concept, form and structure
Light, colour, texture and spatial qualities
Structure, construction, materials and issues of durability and detail
Environmental performance
User satisfaction, value to the client and acceptability of solutions to the brief
Contribution to the advancement of architecture as a discipline and the enhancement of the human spirit
It seems like there’s a panel of jurors that visit the sites as well as meeting with the architects and clients
Thanks! I’m not sure I quite understand architecture enough, but many of the entries seem boring to me 😆. Though it can be hard to judge from one photo.
I don’t know that much about it but it’s an interesting discipline because it’s about usefulness and art all at once.
I’m guessing sometimes if it gets too exciting it either loses functionality or the clients hate it/won’t build it. But yeah I think you’d have to walk around in them to judge them.
Yeah, I just look at these photos and think sure, that’s a nice looking BNZ building. But is it nicer than the one right next to it in the photo, or is it just a standard office building? Some of the houses just look like a house (without eaves, popular during the leaky home period 😆), some are large developments that just look like any other.
Sorry, I think this stuff is lost on me. Maybe when the winner is announced there will be a nice description of everything and then I’ll understand better why it’s well architected.
