• gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Republicans - MUH FREEDUMS

    Also Republicans - You can’t do that! Using the principals of capitalism to better yourself and not a corporation? Your labor is not yours, it belongs to the company, how dare you negotiate the price of your product! Your choice to unionize must be prohibited!

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They are the party of taking things away. It’s literally the core of any legislation or policy positions which come from their party. The fact that they claim to be against government interference in the lives of citizens or fiscal responsibility are laughable details at this point. Even states’ rights are something they believe in only when it suits them.

      They are the party of hypocrisy and regression, and all their most visible leaders are a laughingstock to the world.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        they claim to be against government interference in the lives of citizens or fiscal responsibility

        You haven’t caught any hypocrisy here. They dropped that talk long, long ago. Constituents still have the idea in their heads, but the GOP doesn’t so much as pay lip service to fiscal responsibility, small government or state’s rights.

        Can’t remember when I noticed, but it was pre-Trump. Guess it’s too easy to burn 'em in election ad sound bites.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I do feel like states rights gets trotted out as needed, if not as often as in the past. Isn’t it their primary non-religious defense for overturning Roe?. Otherwise, I think you have a point. I suppose I don’t hear those sorts of claims often like I used to.

  • applepie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    State taking action against peoples right to organize… You would think federal government would enforce its own laws lol

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why would they? They’re in club billionaire and we’re not. All they need nowadays is “not the other candidate.”

      • applepie@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well we all take it like good little bitches… Can’t even ask people to adjust their consumption patterns to fight back corpo daddies becuase

        u taking muhh freedom rheeee, I consoonme exactly as I am told by dadddy, who is u to question that?!

        • ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          People shouldn’t have to adjust their consumption patterns to fight against corporations. Corporations should have to adjust themselves to prevent their offices from being burned down.

          • applepie@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Another naive take lol

            Y’all’s parents let this shit get this far by being obidient cattle. Sold their own kids for 401k and mcmansion. So at this point you either take the fight to the corps or keep being treated like that too. There is no other choice.

            Ain’t no nobody gonna save z peasants unless each one helps him or her self first.

  • 108@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    They started getting jealous of all that freedom in Florida and have to catch up.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Honestly does there exist a company that would acknowledge a union without a vote? I’ve seen instructions in emergency handbooks for someone presenting union cards that say do not acknowledge them. This law has no impact because for profit companies have no conscious.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, of course there do.

      Some smaller companies are run by people still in touch with humanity.

      Some bigger companies might see the writing on the wall and pre-empt the vote as a tactic to gain public goodwill.

  • ferret@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    If similar legislation were passed in my state I would engage in covert extremely lawful peaceful protest

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sounds like it’s high time for the citizens of Alabama to go on a tax strike.