• bloopernova
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think a lot of people, myself included, want to see less talking and instead see some hard, physical evidence. Something that can be touched, examined, and verified by multiple reputable scientists.

      Until that happens this all feels like just words.

      • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Re “just words”, please see the discussion below, in this thread. They have actually been doing things behind the scenes that they discuss in more detail as it becomes publicly known. All I completely bought in? No, but I am leaning forward with interest at this point.

    • SignullGone@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure. People are entitled to their own opinion. I’m just going to keep doing my thing.

  • SignullGone@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s a few nuggets of information in this video. I thought it was pretty insightful. I’ll come back and edit my post with some key points for those that don’t feel like watching.


    Edit:

    • Dozens of witnesses will come forward, but some members of the UFO Legacy Programs still want to keep this technology a secret.

    • Jeremy Corbell reveals that he is friends with some of the people in these UFO Legacy programs. They want to keep the UFO technology a secret and oppose what David Grusch is trying to do.

    • Jeremy Corbell expresses that he is not satisfied with any of their reasons for keeping this all hush-hush.

    • Jeremy Corbell goes into detail about why these unknown objects cannot be man-made.

    • Jeremy Corbell speculates on his five favorite theories about who is behind UAP.

    • The Schumer legislation/amendment was built from knowledge. If you’re hiding this stuff (craft/bodies), you’re screwed.

    • He believes whistleblowers are currently more protected if they go to journalists or the ICIG instead of going to AARO.


    Some interesting quotes from Jeremy.

    I’ve been in SCIFs to give briefings. Them not giving David Grusch a SCIF…that is bullshit. That is the same stuff that’s been going on for a long time.

    Having the individuals who, firsthand, have been held hostage in their jobs, with their clearances, so they can’t leave programs and get jobs outside. They’d have to work at a McDonald’s. Get these patriotic individuals who have come forward to me, and other people, and have them also do things like Inspector General of the Intelligence Community formal, whistleblower complaints under PPD19, which is like a presidential order. So that’s what we do. And by the way, a lot of that’s already ready. Is that you have people, under oath, confirm, everything they’ve said is confirmed. And if our government won’t let that out, it IS coming out. It is coming out. And that’s the first step, that’s the next step. More hearings, under oath, but behind the scenes…is having these official whistleblower acts.

    He also basically stated that If our gov’t won’t let it out, it IS coming out. That sounds like the contingency plan that James Fox referred to a few months ago.

    • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They keep delivering on the statements.

      I was skeptical about whether Knapp and Corbell really had that relationship with Grusch (like maybe they had a few conversations, but nothing really substantial) until they went on Need To Know. That basically told everyone they were on the level (or, for the cynical, in on the scam).

      For me, that was a turning point. There’s a lot of people making moves here and we’re seeing the tip of the iceberg.

      • SignullGone@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with you. They have been working behind the scenes, and when what they say aligns with other journalists such as Ross Coulthart, Chris Sharp, Michael Shellenberger, etc., it reinforces my belief that they know more than they publicly let on.

        Until they are proven wrong about things behind the scenes that emerge, I’ll continue to listen to what they have to say. Being skeptical is always valuable, but it’s hard to ignore all the legislation and government officials taking this seriously.

        This didn’t arise out of a void. There are many moving parts, and in my eyes, these puzzle pieces are slowly coming together.