• ZeroCool@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    1 month ago

    Two days later, Aldama Garcia went to the Hillsborough County Animal Shelter to attempt to retrieve the dog and showed pictures as proof of ownership, according to the affidavit.

    This guy isn’t just an asshole he’s a stupid asshole too. Imagine thinking there was any chance in hell an animal shelter was going to give you back the dog you left to drown while tied to a fence post in a flooded ditch during a hurricane.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I will never comprehend how evil or sociopathic someone has to be to do something like this.

        • weastie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Him hitting you out of nowhere with a passive aggressive “are you vegan?” was not the move, but you have to recognize a bigger picture here.

          When animal abuse happens, and people see it, they are disgusted by it. It makes you feel awful inside, it makes you empathize with the animal.

          But when animal abuse happens and you don’t see it, people don’t seem to care. I mean, what this fellow did to his dog is absolutely atrocious, but frankly it’s mild compared to the 25 million chickens killed daily (USA alone), who are often hung upside down in assembly lines for hours, not to mention the atrocious living conditions they had beforehand. And that’s just the surface.

          Rather than passive-aggressively questioning your ethics like the other user here, I instead urge you to explore these feelings you have about animal cruelty, and think about what happens even when you don’t see it.

        • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          Deutsch
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          55
          ·
          1 month ago

          Sure but a non-vegan can absolutely comprehend putting their own convenience over the well-being of an animal. Downvoting won’t change that.

              • PixellatedDave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Pick a lane. Convenience does not equal cruelty.

                On being able to comprehend, there are human conditions that are beyond my comprehension. I mean as an intellectual thought process I am aware why some people do certain things but it is so far outside of my experience that I could never truly comprehend why.

                • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  Deutsch
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  34
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  It doesn’t have to, but in the case of eating animals it does equal cruelty. For what other pleasure than taste would there be this much bickering when the price is an animals life?

                  Let’s stay with the dog in the picture, would it be cruel to stun it with a bolt gun, hang it upside down and slit it’s throat? Not out of neccesity but because you like the taste?

                  Edit: Again, downvoting won’t change this :)

              • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                IMO, not being able to comprehend cruelty makes someone an ass. The dude in this story could have been kind, polite… they could have helped mow the lawn of their elderly neighbor that’s no longer able to do so themselves.

                Regardless of how otherwise good you are treating a pet that you’ve accepted responsibility for and who, potentially, fully trusts you as family like this… that makes you an ass.

                Anyways I think my only real objection to your original statement is that I don’t think veganism is relevant to this story. I’d say that vegans are more likely to treat their pet well but it’s not a guarantee - even among vegans that made that choice for an ethical reason there are still assholes.

                • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Vegans might be nicer to animals but in my experience they’re generally trash to other people. Also a vegan owning a pet is hypocrisy in the finest form.

  • blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think they should tie this dude to a fence next hurricane that comes around, you know so he can wait out storm. I hope this dog goes to a loving home for the rest of their life.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    People tend to underestimate the importance of laws against animal cruelty. These laws are not only about protecting animals; they also reflect human decency and respect for all forms of life. Furthermore, they often serve as a significant red flag. The number of criminals and sociopaths connected to animal cruelty is far too high to be ignored.

  • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    30 days ago

    How do animal abusers fare in prison? Is it similar to other crimes against the most vulnerable? Because somehow that does carry some poetic justice.