fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agobrains!mander.xyzimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1939arrow-down110
arrow-up1929arrow-down1imagebrains!mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-squareesc27@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26arrow-down3·20 hours agoAt least half of us are below average.
minus-squareabbadon420@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 hours agoIf we’re talking about IQ, than no. An IQ between 85 and 115 is considered average. This entails 68% of the population. So, only 32% of people are not average and only 16% are below average.
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·19 hours agoIt’s not. I assure you there are far more outliers on the low end.
minus-squareKnock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·6 hours agoBut I’m sure there are more people with 200+ IQ than with <0.
minus-squaremilicent_bystandr@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·9 hours agoI endeavour to be as stupid as possible so more people can be above average.
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 minutes agoAmerica thanks you for your service.
At least half of us are below average.
If we’re talking about IQ, than no. An IQ between 85 and 115 is considered average. This entails 68% of the population. So, only 32% of people are not average and only 16% are below average.
You mean the median? :3
It can’t be that many.
It’s not. I assure you there are far more outliers on the low end.
But I’m sure there are more people with 200+ IQ than with <0.
I endeavour to be as stupid as possible so more people can be above average.
America thanks you for your service.