• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They don’t give a shit that the customers will be paying more. In fact, if anything, they probably love the excuse to jack up prices further - or further cut their workforce to the bone, or whatever the latest fad in padding executive compensation packages is.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m sure they probably do - shit as Walmart is a depression in consumer spending is overall bad for them.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        What are the customers going to do? Buy from someone else? Wal-Mart is already often the cheapest option around.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s already often the only option around. So many small businesses like local supermarkets and hardware stores got closed down in small towns by Walmart moving in and now there’s no alternative. I see it all over in central Indiana and Illinois.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Buying less, but they’ll be spending the same amount of money, barring rises in other expenses not directly related to tariffs (rent, utilities, etc). Their quality of life will simply go down. Wal-Mart doesn’t care about that. We could all be medieval peasants for all they care.