• ricecake@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    On the one hand, Carlson being against it makes me assume that it’s probably a good thing, but on the other I’m usually pretty against the use of landmines because they have a strong tendency to sit around for a long time and maim random civilians.

    But if he said the sky was blue I’d have to go check for myself.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The landmines that Biden approved are battery powered. While they are still indiscriminate killing machines, they will self-neutralize rather than remain dangerous for decades to come.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yup.

      I think Biden is wrong for the reasons you lay out. It won’t just be the Russians that suffer from mining.

      WWII ordinances still get pulled up pretty regularly in France.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        Yeah, sure, because the technology is exactly the same now as it was 80 years ago.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        15 hours ago

        World War II ordinances didn’t rely on batteries and so remain(ed) dangerous for far longer.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          13 hours ago

          These are still explosive. While the triggering mechanism may go bad after the battery dies, are the explosive chemicals neutralized? What happens on a shock to the device? For example, if it’s crushed by a vehicle or hit by a plow blade?

          I can grant that these are probably safer than yesteryear’s model, but I also think you are still setting up bobbytraps that are potentially dangerous for decades.

          • Strykker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Most explosives are chemically and physically stable like c4. Driving over them isn’t going to set them off, nor is hitting them with any kind of blunt force.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I mean they’re being invaded, and by Russia out of all countries. Just like their use of cluster ammunition, they probably decided it’s worth the risk.