Faced with relentless Republican attacks on reproductive freedom including efforts to give embryos and fetuses legal rights from the moment of conception, Democratic lawmakers in two states have recently introduced legislation that would ban men from ejaculating for purposes other than making babies, with some exceptions.

  • Sabata@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    Democratic lawmakers in two states have recently introduced legislation that would ban men from ejaculating for purposes other than making babies

    So begins my lonely life of crime.

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    If the intention here was to show conservatives how unreasonable it is to grant legal rights to a fetus then I’d say it failed miserably and achieved the exact opposite; further evidence to spread around in the right-wing circles to demonstrate how out of touch the “libs” are. Well done - it’s as if they don’t even want to win elections anymore.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No it isn’t.

      this bill is an equally valid response to reproductive rights and a bodily autonomy being stolen and withheld from women.

      If reproductive rights and bodily autonomy are being stolen and withheld from American women, then reproductive Rights and bodily autonomy should be stolen and withheld from American men.

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        It’s posturing that allows their opponents to run ads about how they waste time with stupid fucking fake bills instead of actually trying to get shit done.

        I know it might be hard to see now, but an eye for an eye is how we got here in the first place.

        These joke bills do nothing of any value for anyone that understands that the bills aren’t meant to be taken literally seriously, and only make idiots mad at “the demonrats” for “bein dumbasses while our country burns”.

    • ggppjj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Someone needs to let these performative politicians know that they won’t be able to logic their opponents out of wanting something that they didn’t use logic to get to the point of wanting.

      Never wrestle with pigs. You both get dirty and the pig likes it.

  • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Getting rid of the laws won’t help you creating new laws won’t help. Getting rid of these 90-year-old Republicans who have been sitting in an office since the 60s would solve everything 

    • imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Riiight because the 42 years old creep republican Gaetz wouldn’t pass a terrible law?

      It’s republicans not old people.

      • wisely@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        34 minutes ago

        At this point the ancient people are the most likely to flip if certain lines are crossed. They were there before the current politics and don’t have a future to risk. Plus decades of ego.

        The young guys aren’t even going to consider voting with dems no matter what the situation. They all recently went into office being onboard with everything.

      • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I forgot about Gaetz, but was thinking about Chuck Grassley, Mitch McConnell, Diane Feinstein, and Jim Rush, who are all somewhere between 80 and 1000 years old