• absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    No. If you are actively searching for something, and go to a specific place that sells that thing. It is not advertising, the active party is you not them.

    The problem is when the active party is the ad-networks, the trackers, the junk pushers.

    If I go to a review site, for say lawn mowers, and they say hey brand 1 is great, but brand 2 is better because of ‘reasons’; I am active, engaging in the process. If however, I then go to a site that is about tigers, and brand 3 pushes their ad to intrude on the tiger info…this (in my opinion) is a major intrusion into my private space.

    • laranis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Would you ban television commercials? Sponsored products unrelated to a YouTube video’s content?

      I completely agree with you. So tired of pushed garbage ads. There’s just a gray area so the language of a hypothetical “law” would have to carefully considered.

      • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Television ads are a grey area, they don’t tend to track you and follow you around in a creepy way.

        Sponsored content, is in my opinion very similar to TV ads, the sponsor is the same for all viewer of the vid in a similar way to TV.