• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    What does that change? Its about the system and their ability to do so from a central control point. Bluesky was doomed before it started with how it is set up and governed.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Exactly. At least with Mastodon and all Fediverse platforms you don’t have some overlord who can just remove anything on a whim.

      Bluesky was never the solution to the Twitter problem.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yes you do? If the moderator or admin of your instance doesn’t like something, it’s gone.

        Sure you could post to another instance, but the line of posting to another instance or posting to another service is a thin one.

        I fully agree that Bluesky is far from the distributed haven it might claim to be, but just because it makes a decision that any Fediverse instance might have made doesn’t mean it’s over.

        Bluesky has problems, but those problems are still within the realm of fixable. Fediverse alternatives may be better, but Bluesky is still fine.

        • Lad@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          An instance mod isn’t the same as corporate ownership who can purge anything from anywhere at any time.

      • vinyl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I hope you are joking, you are saying this as if one person runs the entire company lmao