It was recently reported that Valve has been banning any Steam games if its’ programs detect AI generated art, unless those submitting the title can prove ownership of the intellectual property. This information comes from Twitter user, @simoncarless, who posted an excerpt from a Steam denial template. The post says the following:
“After reviewing, we have identified intellectual property in [Game Name Here] which appears to belongs to one or more third parties. In particular, [Game Name Here] contains art assets generated by artificial intelligence that appears to be relying on copyrighted material owned by third parties.”
“As the legal ownership of such Al-generated art is unclear, we cannot ship your game while it contains these Al-generated assets, unless you can affirmatively confirm that you own the rights to all of the IP used in the data set that trained the Al to create the assets in your game.”
“We are failing your build and will give you one (1) opportunity to remove all content that you do not have the rights to from your build. If you fail to remove all such content, we will not be able to ship your game on Steam, and this app will be banned.”
I’m a very old school computer graphic guy, 1980 onward. I can tell you that the same was said about computer graphics in general. It was considered even ‘less’ artistic than photography. But then, food for thought, one of the primary goals of computer graphics was to create ‘photorealistic’ images. Just like painting in the 60s and 70s. So everyone was imitating everyone.
A sculpture professor once dismissed some of my students’ art as being ‘as simple as pressing a button’.
It’s all art. None of it is lazy. Even lazy art is sometimes intentionally so.
That’s interesting. I wonder how they deal with false positives? Conceivably, you could have an AI generate intermediate “partially complete” digital art and then argue that you have evidence that the finished work was created by hand with screenshots etc.
The article is highly misleading. Valve’s statements did not align with the claims made in the article. Their actions merely involved potentially banning an individual due to a reported incident of using stolen assets. It’s astonishing how much attention this situation has received solely based on a Reddit post.
I wish that this damn platform had an option to pin a comment. Also, please provide some sources, it will be very helpful with learning more on the topic.
deleted by creator
If AI is plagiarising art and design, then so is every human artist and designer in the world
https://vulcanpost.com/830661/ai-plagiarising-art-and-design/
deleted by creator
This is the cure you’re searching for: https://www.biia.com/japan-goes-all-in-copyright-doesnt-apply-to-ai-training/ (“Japan Goes All In: Copyright Doesn’t Apply To AI Training”).
deleted by creator
Ah yes, “the world is bad but we should just accept it and roll with it instead of trying to change mindsets of people on different topics so we can gradually move towards better future”. That’s not how it works, people need to be educated on topics first before we can act together towards better future with good understanding on the topic so we don’t fuckup anything.
But at a much greater scale. I cannot browse through billions of images, to then draw images without any intent or understanding what I’m drawing.
Another big issue with AI is spam, hence why Valve is removing them from their store.
