• otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Kimi and Deepseek both seem to do a decent job.

      Something funky is going on. They’re somewhat random each time I refresh. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don’t.

      • wischi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s intended. Look at the second hand for a minute. It goes 1, 2, 3, etc. like on a real clock but the numbers are distributed differently. That’s also why the hands sometimes have to move faster to reach their target in time. It goes (backwards) if it’s closer.

  • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Order by string desc would be Z-A ordering, or 9-0

    ORDER BY str(Hour) DESC: 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 12, 11, 10, 1

    ORDER BY int(Hour) DESC: 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Probably a bunch of error messages relating to improperly executed macro scripts, failed external api calls, and maybe copilot demanding you put all your documents into one drive… and also somehow the same ‘hey, do you have a moment?’ Teams message from one person, but somehow on 2 or 3 different versions of Teams, simultaneously.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is why the military uses 03 hundred hours… Makes things clear, and sortable regardless of your algorithm

    • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Sure. No one ever in this entire world ever did a int(“0200”), because it is insane to represent numbers as actual numbers. I am so glad that military invented a standard working with any algorithm.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean, I hear you, but to be fair, I think the military has been using that kind of a timing convention since before computing even really existed.

        … We did more or less invent modern computers, initially, to compute artillery ranging tables.

        I’m pretty sure that predates even the concept of … a string vs int data type.

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Depends on what you call a “computer”. The first electronic calculating machine sold by the company now known as IBM was for the census, and it was prior to WWI.

          Edit: we need to fight back on this idea that the military drives technological innovation. That’s only true because of the shitty values our society has.

            • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Hollerith was American-born to German immigrants. The census in question was also the 1890 US census.

              It’s a cool story. With the rise in population, the 1890 census was not predicted to be completed before they had to start the 1900 census. With Hollerith’s machine, it was instead done in record time.

  • getFrog@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Print that header onto the dial in a monospace font and you’ve got yourself an extremely marketable product. Perfect thing to bring to a white elephant gift exchange at an IT Company!