[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art

NSFW

hexbear.net

235

[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art

NSFW

hexbear.net

iridaniotter [they/them]@hexbear.net to

the_dunk_tank@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year ago

235

https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857

No, the art does not depict bestiality, don’t worry.

Chat

the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

It’s the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow chapos. Wreckers/CHUDs are allowed. If they aren’t banned yet then report them, don’t post them.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances’ admins or moderators.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

110 users / day
439 users / week
27 users / month
683 users / 6 months
9 local subscribers
15.6K subscribers
2.61K Posts
69.8K Comments
Modlog