Because you won’t come in tomorrow obviously!!!1111111111111!!! Think of the D O W !!!
- 0 Posts
- 46 Comments
DeadDigger@lemmy.zipto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•This image is over 15 years old. It's classic. Exquisite. Unique and rare. One of a kind meme. Something for the people who enjoy vintage. Enjoy
11·2 days agoThis man was art. This is the definition of punk and post modernism
DeadDigger@lemmy.zipto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•One of the most interesting things that happens when you are old
41·2 days ago… And then having to admit they where right because your mind gets flaky
From what I currently can infer you are not willing to discuss anything just to flame others. It starts with you being insulting in claiming others are addicts you proceed in using an intentional week souce that just copied wikipedia and changed one word basically and then start to use a hominem when called out on it. Further you use basically the same pattern than any other conspiracy theorist.
For me you just seem like a bad faith actor and not interested in discussion now.
Well you source is kinda … bad. In medicine a paradoxical reaction is described as a reaction which is basically unexpected. Your source is throwing things together that are not right in this way. It basically conflated research over methylphenidate, a very common ADHD medication, with all stimulants and a lot of narcotics.
Methylphenidate has no paradox reaction, because it also works in non ADHD children - just not as strong. While there are not systematic medical trials on Coffein there are a lot of weaker studies on it that show a high amount of evidence that it has a calming effect. The discussion here is if this isn’t the same in the normal population too, not if it has a calming effect.
The source you had makes claims and then does not show any evidence for these btw.
No it’s common for ADHD ppl because most stimulants have a paradox reaction. That’s why you get meth and amphetamines. I mean most are also caffeine addicts. But it doesn’t work because we are addicts
The sun toaster thing from technological connections is lit
Except good working boots are not cheaper just more comfortable. Due to the sole being a raised you need to replace it every 2-3 years which isn’t that cheap either. Speaking from experience
DeadDigger@lemmy.zipto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Thanks ChatGPT for helping convince my partner youre not a threat to anyone.
5·10 days agoTbh this is more effort than most ppl put into their posts
DeadDigger@lemmy.zipto
196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•this meme makes me feel funny insideEnglish
10·10 days agoPatpatpat
DeadDigger@lemmy.zipto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Western Digital details 14-platter 3.5-inch HAMR HDD designs with 140 TB and beyondEnglish
3·10 days agoRunning more multi box copies of gw2
Well what can I say I like mint
This is a gay sex joke isn’t it?
May I introduce you to the concept of time travel in the time machine, where you are in a gravitationally bound dimensional pocket
DeadDigger@lemmy.zipto
Guild Wars 2@lemmy.wtf•Game Update Notes: February 3, 2026English
2·15 days agoWell there is now a t6 back for 50 depending on how many are in there this could be 20s-2gold given that old bags of this kind had 5 in it
I can assure you most flurries are not trans. Trekkies on the other hand
DeadDigger@lemmy.ziptoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Consequences for hit-and-run on a snowmanEnglish
6·16 days agoFunny
DeadDigger@lemmy.zipto
World News@lemmy.world•France moves to abolish concept of marital duty to have sexEnglish
12·16 days agoOk but where is that other possibility you are talking about? There are like you said and stated 4 different ways:
Both agree and agree on the splitting of possessions
Both agree and disagree on the splitting of possessions
Your spouse commits “serious or renewed violation of the duties and obligations”
And you don’t live together anymore for at least a year and this is not consensually (which it seems you would also have to prove)
Given you live in a dead bedroom relationship (say after you got children or due to medical problems) and you accepted it (which can take years already). From these 4 choices you are basically out of luck and stuck. Either you get a new place (and potentially abandon your children) or you can proof that you life together but in rapture(I think that’s the correct word) but this can very easily be impeded by your spouse and if you are the primary caregiver for your children even hard to proof. I mean you can get your own bank but when your partner just doesn’t give you money you kinda still have to use the shared one or get bills paid by your partner. Do I miss anything here? Because this means instead of however long a divorce will take it will now take at least a year more. Because if I see this correctly with the acceptance period and cout time this will already take upwards of 4 years or 5% of your life were your needs will not be satisfied(or even attempted to be satisfied).
I don’t know about France but most civilized countries I know about have laws against rape in marriage, without looking it up I guess France have too. Martial obligations should encompass normal relationship things like caring for each other, being consensual and having sex. Saying key points for a median relationship like sex are not part of your obligation in a marriage feels absurd to me. Feeling coerced to have sex to not fault the marriage for me feels again completely illogical even as an argument. At this point your marriage is broken because at least one partner is very unhappy with it. This will just prolong the time you are stuck in a broken marriage and therefor maximize unhappiness. Having a dead bedroom marriage can even lead to you being unfaithful, faulting your marriage. Sex is the strongest urge in humans after all. This all just seems like a lot of Christian morals and not much of useful laws.
Btw if sex is not a martial obligation why is faithfulness again? Does sex now matter for marriage or does it not?
For me this feels just like populism. instead of useful and meaningful changes to an obviously broken law a bandaid is used that just makes the law more broken. It is based on “things have occured” without any data to back it up just on a “feels like it level”. Why, instead, scrap option 3 and 4 and just replace it with a “doesn’t work for me anymore” option? Why is there still a judgement based system and not a relationship quality based system in place? Because this is just veiled populism, sexism and religious moral.

As someone with food intolerances/allergies I very much feel that