GP, Farmer, Radical Progressive

  • 79 Posts
  • 127 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2025

help-circle


  • u/elwexo over on the alien site did some digging

    TL;DR It’s a land development matter, basically mining sand in an apparently environmentally sensitive area, which one of the other councillors has a financial interest in (they appear to have abstained from the vote). It was narrowly (4-3) passed.

    From the minutes:

    Item 9.1.2: That council pursuant to Schedule 2, Part 9, Clause 68(2)(b) of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015 and the provisions of the Shire of Donnybrook Balingup Local Planning Scheme No. 7 (LPS7), approves the Development Application P25035 Industry-Extractive (Sand) at Lot 10 Donnybrook Boyup Brook, Yabberup subject to the following conditions and advice:
    [several pages of notes]






  • All of this it true, I live in SW WA and it’s not quite so bad, a lot of people are scaling back herbicide use and optimising with rotational grazing etc. but even the most responsible land owners use literal tonnes of super phosphate, and that’s just the grazers, the vineyards, avocados, stone fruit etc all use huge volumes of herbicides, pesticides, fertiliser.

    Our family farm is relatively responsible and as I take over more management I’ll be pushing a more restorative model but I have a lucrative second income. Our immediate neighbour runs a ridiculous stocking rate with his cattle and they are skinny cattle grazing on stubble, the crazy thing is that colesworth have begun penalising ‘overweight’ cattle so on average he gets a higher price per kilo than a farmer treating their animals humanely.

    Industrial farming is a disaster. Small holdings are less extractive, less exploitative, and produce more calories per hectare. You can make a reasonable income on a small holding too, you just need to be able to buy the land, and if you’re not a millionaire or have family land that isn’t happening.











  • Let’s deconstruct this.

    This fellow was behaving in a way that is against our stated national values, is threatening to citizens and other residents of this country, and is against the law.

    He is now facing the predictable legal consequences of breaking the law, ie had he consulted a lawyer or even looked into it himself beforehand he would’ve known that this would be the likely outcome.

    You’re now inferring from this that legitimate political speech may be curtailed in the future despite there being no legal mechanism for this to happen.

    Many on the far left like to claim that liberals will always defend the rights of fascists to be fascists, that’s sometimes unfair but this kind of nonsense is how liberals get that reputation. (‘Small l’ liberals of course)




  • It is absurd the Medicare doesn’t cover dental. I see a patient once or twice a month delaying dental care because of cost.

    I kind of understand the government being cautious about controversial reforms but the libs had literally nothing to say about the recent GP bulk billing changes as it’s just popular. Medicare covering dental care and increasing school funding to meet Gonski targets are almost opposition proof.

    Incidentally I am a doctor and I don’t have insurance. I don’t wear glasses, I don’t play sports that ruin my joints and I’m not getting pregnant. There is literally no benefit. On top of which, when I was a junior doctor it wasn’t uncommon for us to have a private patient transferred to the public system when the private physician realised they were actually sick and not just a pay day, the public system treats sick patients, the private system has nice carpet and nurses that smile. We need to remove Medicare payments to private providers and invest properly into public healthcare.

    Sorry for the tangentially related rant.