OwO what’s this? *notices your copy of Mein Kampf*

The end game is to avoid legal consequences for their actions. These people don’t understand the legal system and believe it works like an arcane magic system. If they send the right letters to the right people, they can make all their problems go away.

In this case, they believe there is a letter they can send someone that causes that person to owe them 1 gold bar per month unless that person performs some kind of action. This one sounds like it was sent to the New York State courts in an attempt to get them to drop legal action against them (or give them gold).

Searching “notice of liability” gets you a bunch of conspiracy theory websites with templates and instructions.

I get it. I also get that the reason this is an issue is because he lost a seat he held for 20 years and needs help from others to keep his job and house. He talks about personal responsibility and then asks for handouts when he loses. He talks about government elites and then uses his political status to get special treatment. It is an example of his hypocrisy.

Guy living in the government funded house for the leader of the official opposition, even though he is not the leader of the official opposition, suggests the PM isn’t being ethical.

because 99% of gamers do not give a fuck.

Then why would any government care?

Checkout Mommy

This gives me AI vibes.

atro_city said it well:

If the SKG movement doesn’t organise, that’s all we’ll get: a communiqué to shut the hell up.

Over a million Europeans have signed a petition in less than a month. Why only Europeans? Big ecelebs like PewDiePie and Critikal have made videos on this. It’s got a lot of people interested. Why not get everyone in on something more direct? Something international? Why does the world need to sit and wait and hope the EU parliament fixes everything? It seems like a waste of momentum. It needs to be more than just a European petition. A call to boycott the worst companies until they change their EULA and TOS would be a great start.

My point is that the movement should be doing more than just signing an online petition. What happens if the EU parliament declines to make any changes? Nothing? Oh well we tried? What will you do?

Smokin that whoopi goldberg south egyptian fur burger deluxe megamillion scratcher skunk bubba kush

How? I genuinely believe something along the lines of an organized boycott would be far more impactful than a hail mary petition. The reason I think it wouldn’t work is because most people couldn’t commit. That’s why I said this isn’t activism.

It’s not activism if you’re not putting in any effort. I don’t care if people downvote me, but at least post an actual opinion. Have an actual stance. I’m glad others have posted some, although all of them seem to be along the lines of “this petition will definitely fix everything so we don’t need to try anything else”.

Discussion on the internet is dead. You ask a question and people respond with meme pictures and downvotes instead of a point.

Voting is activism?

using official channels is certainly not activism.

Isn’t that called “lobbying”?

I mean to encourage people to actually do something as sharing a post on social media isn’t activism.

Give me an example of a “successful one”. I’ve read only two initiatives have lead to law changes. One on the minimum cage sizes for farm animals being slightly bigger and one on banning pesticides that ended up with slightly more oversight on their use. All the others that passed only resulted in a statement by the government with no legal changes.

Did anyone actually expect the EU to regulate a multibillion dollar industry because it’s trending on social media?

eh

It’s a trade negotiation, he didn’t invade Austria.
It’s a trade negotiation, he didn’t invade Austria.
It’s a trade negotiation, he didn’t invade Austria.
It’s a trade negotiation, he didn’t invade Austria.

Appeasement was when Allied powers allowed Hitler to build a giant military and invade neighbouring countries without penalty. It wasn’t about negotiating a trade deal. When negotiating, it is expected both sides are willing to give up some of their wants to reach a deal. Giving something up during negotiation isn’t appeasement.

the Walrus: Canada’s conversations

This article was written by an American for Americans. It compares the Finnish parental benefits system to that of the US. Canada is never mentioned once and the monetary amounts are all in USD.