When I search “Youtube” or “Twitter” on MBFC, the website does not show up on MBFC. When I search “dropsite” I am told it is a news website with high credibility. MBFC must not understand what news is.

But interesting to know WordPress is not allowed. I do not believe anyone was aware of this rule before. Nor has it been enforced.

Also, I am still waiting on a response to your other claim. You cited accusations deeming anti-Zionist Latuff comics antisemitic. I have provided several examples of these accusations. Are you sticking to your original position?

News sites publish their content using WordPress. Similar to how news sites now host their content using SubStack. It allows journalists to do journalism instead of webdevelopment.

This used to be a big gatekeeping thing back in the day, with people claiming that WordPress websites are not real websites.

I will take up your suggestion about creating an alternative community as you are only doubling down on your nonexistent rules.

Comparing a news organisation with a domain name which solely uses Substack for layout and a subscription model to Twitter is complete nonsense. Are there Twitter accounts with their own “MBFC rating”?

Your arguments are akin to claiming that wordpress websites are not real websites. It is pure gatekeeping and the fact that you even have to go against your own MBFC standards to enfore rules pulled out of thin air really shows you are grasping at straws here.

Acknowledged by whom? People who literally ascribe themselves working for Zionist lobbies? Where is your evidence?

Is this antisemitic?

https://jcpa.org/article/anti-semitic-cartoons-on-progressive-blogs/

Is this anti semitic Jordan?

Or do you mean this one?

Is condemning baby killers anti semitic?

The images do not appear to load. Any working mirror?

Jordanlund brought up “blogs” as a nonsense reason to ban dropsite.

There is no rule against substack nor against ‘blogs’ and dropsite is even approved by MBFC.

The mod is pulling rules out of thin air.

Where is your evidence? Show me the comic. Or are you going to point to Zionist hearsay blogs as your evidence?

So Dropsite writes personal commentary and is not an organisation employing multiple journalists. Correct?

Your argument is a Zionist writer writing for a Zionist rag calling anti Zionist Jews antisemitic?

It is clear you are not here in good faith. I will keep in mind you deem all criticism of Israel antisemitic.

Good. Should have done that to begin with.

Mondoweiss – Bias and Credibility

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

Overall, we rate Mondoweiss as Left Biased and Questionable due to the blending of opinion with news, the promotion of pro-Palestinian and anti-zionist propaganda, occasional reliance on poor sources, and hate group designation by third-party pro-Israel advocates. (D. Van Zandt 3/4/2017) Updated (12/07/2023)

Define the term blog site.

The BBC and New York times will publish the confession uncritically to manufacture consent for Israel torturing doctors.

Who cares about Yemeni children. Think about the poor American pilots bombing them!

Also this one which really shows how Zionist the MBFC authors are.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mondoweiss/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/drop-site-news-bias-and-credibility/

Factual Reporting: MOSTLY FACTUAL (2.2)

Failed Fact Checks

None in the Last 5 years

Gonna be tough to get reelected

You are already banning certain websites and not allowing others at the discretion of a rating system operated by a Zionist. MBFC is rated by Wikipedia as unreliable source. Yet this does not seem to bother your “factuality”.

There are not a thousand independent journalists and news outlets popping up on Substack and people keep posting different ones. There only a handful actual journalists on there not writing opinion articles but doing real reporting.