There’s also more people trying to get a s tech job so for things to remain the same the graph needs to be positive

Yes. This is more indicative of your own biases

If you want to be precise, that’s called the converse in formal logic

I do think the people behind it like the idea of data portability and decen, just not enough to compromise their business for it.

Even if you count every single person in a military area as a combatant

What about prisoners?

I thought it would be me, but… I can’t

I don’t know who you’re arguing against, but it ain’t me

So so you apply the same logic to real life “terrorists”?

That’s movie niceness. There’s another faction of the rebellion they comes up a few times that has no such qualms.

Also are you really telling me everyone on the death star and whatever planet in the sequels was a combatant

So… were you generally offering it at a good price? Or did your career rely on the fact that they didn’t check

That doesn’t make sense. He bought it so he could control the narrative. You can’t do that if you kill the newspaper

That’s literally all money

Llms are made by genuinely smart mathematicians and computer scientists. Techbros are just the ones hyping them .

Aljazeera is pretty unbiased on anything not related to Qatar

There are more reasonable people reading and not commenting

This is the one I know. It’s more catchy too https://dontasktoask.com/

In my experience Google maps is frequently wrong about the last 20 meters or so.

So you’re wandering around the block looking for the entrance

I hate that I’ve seen so much llm writing that this human written comment irks me off because it uses similar patterns.

Half the web is going to be another llm soon

Idk I like the Victorian example. It does possible a lot more detail than ‘average’ and gives me a vivid picture