The real means to prevent this is unionizing, which is really the answer to most other techbro-hellscape problems too. Just like Hollywood is putting anti-ai clauses in their contracts, so too will tech workers need to. Unfortunately, given that the end goal is to remove the IT workers entirely, this is still only a delay if companies push ahead, since just like scabs, there will always be people willing to sell their fellow workers down the river for their own enrichment.

But we’re not even close to that point; most tech workers think unionizing is a 4-letter word. There’s always a private chat room where folks are lamenting the absolute class-ignorance of their coworkers who are all convinced they’re going to stumble into unicorn stock options soon, despite multiple rounds of layoffs each year now being standard in tech.

The real question is what has to happen to end this horrible capitalist nightmare in general.

Her story didn’t end when she was killed, and it is very relevant that her queerness is being weaponized to rationalize and justify her killing by conservatives.

I think your “everyone else” is excluding about 1/3 of the country. Go on a conservative news site, and see if you can find one article about her that doesn’t mention her being lesbian, and understand that they do so because those sites are ‘smearing’ her to their homophobic readers, so they won’t empathize with her.

Go into a conservative space on any social media, and tell me how many are lamenting her death at all, rather than calling her a ‘professional agitator’ or saying she brought it on herself.

Yeah, even as horrible as I know conservatives are, it was still shocking how many of them were making jokes about this, or treating it as somehow making her murder okay. Between this and how many conservatives have been making open ‘jokes’ about mass-murdering the GTA 6 pride parade attendees (the existence of which is not actually something R* has said, and is mostly just these same people pushing), people need to realize that the average conservative is starting to ideate about killing queer people.

Hey, finger crossed! Hope this turns into something. :)

Because Wall Street knows that Trump will let them ride along for the plundering if they bribe him, and (if we ignore that no Democrat president would do this in the first place) they know that a Democrat wouldn’t… At least not in the same way.

Ah yes, the evergreen claim of being about to unveil his Healthcare Housing Plan!

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SF5MiM-P2p4

Deadbert.

Oh no!

Anyways.

independent has always meant the freedom to create whatever you want without input unwanted influence from anyone else.

Yes, and if a publisher is present, you cannot as a consumer ensure this is the case. No publisher actually makes their contracts with dev studios public for review, or allows people to review their internal communication.

No, this distinction prevents publishers from co-opting “indie” as a label, which people support because of that artistic discretion, and hiding it behind their opaque promises of such independence that no one can verify. You cannot trust a dev hasn’t been influenced by a publisher when they’re present, so the only way to ensure that is to not have a publisher present.

I don’t know that movie, but I do know actual indie devs who use e.g. Patreon for funding. It’s not about not having money, it’s about who your money comes from, and whether there can be hidden stipulations on it. With publishers, there always are.

I’m a big proponent of actually trying out a new configuration each week for the first month or so, for a living room. You’d be surprised how different it actually feels with furniture in different spots, but most people tend to just place it when they move in and leave it. Living rooms also tend to be fewer furniture pieces than a bedroom or office, so more feasible to re-arrange.

This will also really help identify where your tv should be placed, to minimize glare or reflections.

As someone with transphobic parents (including one who was actually fired for repeatedly and very pointedly dead-naming, we found out later) and a trans nephew, in their cases I there are 2 things I’ve seen:

1. the “it’s not real”/ “young people made it up” thing:

This is something my less ‘angry’ transphobic dad does, just writing it off as a ‘fake’ trend where young people do it because of either peer pressure or for attention (positive or negative). He continuously dead names my trans nephew when not in his presence because he doesn’t think it matters to anyone else, but will usually not do so to his face.

2. the “I don’t like it, and I’m personally offended by things I dislike, and they’re bad people for offending me” thing:

This is my mom, who was fired for continuously dead-naming a coworker and then loudly refusing to stop. She is very prudish, very conservative, and is just an all-around craven and bitter person.

She just pretends my nephew doesn’t exist, or if forced to talk about him, insists that he’s been brainwashed by his mom. She literally gets angry at the mere existence of trans people, because to her, being confronted with something she doesn’t like is literally a personal offense.

This is in line with her reaction to any criticism, and also her tendency to eventually hate anyone she has to interact with frequently enough, because no one perfectly agrees with you about everything. Not a joke, she used to change jobs every 1-2 years, and each new place she worked would follow the same progression: “I love my new coworkers, everyone’s so nice.” -> “The people here are so mean to me/ ignore me/ etc”. She lives alone, has basically no friends, and is miserable from what I can tell. She’s also super racist, but swears up and down otherwise, but that’s a story for another time.

tl;dr either 1) dismissive, or 2) have zero empathy and just want everyone to conform to their worldview.

Obviously individuals cannot personally fulfill all the things a government does, but that’s because the government is a large group of people. A similarly large group of people who are not employed by a government can still accomplish the same tasks; a weather forecaster for example doesn’t stop being one just because they’re not doing it for a government.

If critical functions that protect lives can be gutted and lost at the whims of a remote and sometimes hostile government we clearly have little control over, perhaps that’s the wrong structure to maintain those functions? After all, it’s not like Trump hasn’t floated enforcing different regulations or providing or not providing help based on location (i.e. excluding Blue states from federal aid) anyways, so even keeping the jobs and regulations in place doesn’t mean they’re actually going to be used to help us.

A lot of the functions like water quality monitoring are done at local levels anyways, even if regulations around them are federal.

Maybe a better lesson from this is that just one civically-engaged person can make a huge difference to a community.

This is great to see, and as long as it’s up to companies whether to do this we need to encourage that behavior… but it also shouldn’t be up to companies’ whims whether to do this or not. It should be legally required for end-of-support devices and software to release whatever source code or changes are necessary to either operate the device/software independent of a server, or run the server ourselves.

I don’t believe those actually resulted in rulings in Musk’s favor. GARM (the org he accused of being an anti-trust violation) shut down citing the legal costs of the case, and afaik the case against the constituent companies is still ongoing, but unlikely to end in his favor. It’s purely a SLAPP lawsuit.

Honestly, operating a private streaming site is much safer than pirate VHF/ UHF broadcasts, both in terms of what you’ll get charged with, and how long you’ll remain undetected. VHF and UHF broadcasts are literal homing beacons (and without something to bounce the signal off, very limited in what you’d reach).

Jellyfin on an offshore VPS, with invite-only accounts otoh…

I was commenting on a likely Democrat going to a convention 5 years into an airborne pandemic that targets whoever its spreaders deem “genetically weak” (via its immune system test) to kill or disable.

I’m going to need a whole lot of context that’s not in this post. If you think this post is calling out a specific Democrat, you have not conveyed that at all.

And Nazis denied that racism makes no sense. Denialism isn’t particularly what defines non-Nazis.

“Nazis denied that racism makes no sense”. Wait, so you think that 1) racism makes no sense, and 2) Nazis denied it/ claim otherwise (i.e. they claim racism makes sense)? I think you’re severely mis-stating whatever you’re trying to convey. Racism is a very real thing, and it’s usually Republicans and Nazis who claim it makes no sense as a concept, and claim it’s just a label created to attack them for political purposes.

“Being racist makes no sense” is a very different statement than “racism makes no sense”. I think you meant to say the former.

Nazis denied that their beliefs were rooted in racism, because racism was (even in the 1930s) understood as a cognitive and cultural bias, not beliefs rooted in science or fact. They didn’t deny their own disdain for non-white people, they just denied that it was racism. Eugenics as a pseudo-scientific framework was developed in order to legitimize racist beliefs so that racists could openly tout those beliefs without them being labeled racist. Racists (Nazis included) didn’t want to have to deny their racism.

Denialism is in fact contra-indicative to Nazism, who were very concerned with legitimizing their beliefs openly, so as not to have to hide/ deny them.

If being depressed made people stop needing food

Show me where you think I said this.

I’ll assume you have no actual rebuttal than, shall I?