• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -371 month ago

    Different design philosophies. Fewer moving parts, fewer things to break.

    One thing I’ve heard is that Tesla has plans to detect oncoming hazards and not allow the door to open if, say, a car or bicycle is approaching nearby. More difficult if there’s always a physical link between the handle and door latch.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      421 month ago

      Fewer moving parts, fewer things to break.

      You are talking about a regular door handle, which tends to last for many, many decades without failing, right?

      Electronics are far, far more likely to fail than physical links.

        • @Tja
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          Tesla bad, haven’t you gotten the news?

    • Hildegarde
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 month ago

      Having one handle to open the door is a better implementation of that philosophy than two entirely separate door opening systems.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        How does it work exactly? If you pull normally, it opens electrically, if you pull harder and further then it opens mechanically?

        • @Zink
          link
          English
          41 month ago

          There could be a sensor that detects the handle being pulled before the handle starts to engage the mechanical release. As soon as the handle has moved the minimum distance (or had the minimum force applied), the windows could move down and the actuator moves the door mechanism before the handle even engages with it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 month ago

      Solenoids have been a thing for actuating door latches since the 50s. As it turns out in the last 70 years most manufacturers realized they were less reliable than the basic mechanical latches used on almost every car.