@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-21 month agoName & shame. :)mander.xyzimagemessage-square95fedilinkarrow-up11.03Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageName & shame. :)mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • edit-21 month agomessage-square95fedilink
minus-squareI Cast FistlinkEnglish2•1 month agoThey didn’t proofread, plus there’s a real chance that some other parts of the paper might be AI nonsense. If something so glaringly problematic got past, what smaller mistakes are also there? They effectively poisoned their own paper
They didn’t proofread, plus there’s a real chance that some other parts of the paper might be AI nonsense. If something so glaringly problematic got past, what smaller mistakes are also there? They effectively poisoned their own paper