@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agoEvil Statisticianmander.xyzimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1236arrow-down14starcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
arrow-up1232arrow-down1imageEvil Statisticianmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square6fedilinkstarcopymore-verticalflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
minus-square@NaiveBayesianlinkEnglish4•4 months agoWhatever it takes to prove that √(log k/ε² + log log n) error bound with 95% probability – “probably almost correct” – what else do you need, really? arrow-up14arrow-down10file-textreply1starmore-verticalmailMessageflagCreate ReportslashBlock user
Whatever it takes to prove that √(log k/ε² + log log n) error bound with 95% probability – “probably almost correct” – what else do you need, really?