When I first started using Linux 15 years ago (Ubuntu) , if there was some software you wanted that wasn’t in the distro’s repos you can probably bet that there was a PPA you could add to your system in order to get it.

Seems that nowadays this is basically dead. Some people provide appimage, snap or flatpak but these don’t integrate well into the system at all and don’t integrate with the system updater.

I use Spek for audio analysis and yesterday it told me I didn’t have permission to read a file, I a directory that I owned, that I definitely have permission to read. Took me ages to realise it was because Spek was a snap.

I get that these new package formats provide all the dependencies an app needs, but PPAs felt more centralised and integrated in terms of system updates and the system itself. Have they just fallen out of favour?

  • 0x0
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t get the down-votes, Canonical does want to become a walled garden. Money talks.

    • mcforest@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      But is this comment really an answer to this question or just a rant about Canonical?

      • 0x0
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Both, really, PPAs are an Ubuntu thing and Ubuntu’s moving towards becoming a walled garden, which includes snap.