@[email protected]M to [email protected] • 4 months agoSovcit needs some help.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1134arrow-down12
arrow-up1132arrow-down1imageSovcit needs some help.lemmy.world@[email protected]M to [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-square@hyperhypervisorlink9•4 months agoactually, that usage makes sense if you realize that you’re licensing the roads, not the car.
minus-squarepartial_accumenlinkfedilink4•4 months agoExcept the Sovcit above is extending the “license” to the equal state ownership of the car.
minus-square@hyperhypervisorlink5•4 months agoOh I’m not defending the Sovcit in the slightest. I’m just pointing out that the license still works in the same way as a software license, but the license is for the roads.
actually, that usage makes sense if you realize that you’re licensing the roads, not the car.
Except the Sovcit above is extending the “license” to the equal state ownership of the car.
Oh I’m not defending the Sovcit in the slightest. I’m just pointing out that the license still works in the same way as a software license, but the license is for the roads.