@[email protected] to People [email protected] • 4 months agoWhat could have been...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down177
arrow-up1938arrow-down1imageWhat could have been...lemmy.world@[email protected] to People [email protected] • 4 months agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-square@thisisnotgoingwelllink4•edit-24 months agoI think what they’re saying is that we subsidize losses for the rich, but for citizens it’s rugged individualism. Bootstraps and such. The tax dollars are always there to bail out companies or to fight wars, but not to serve the needs of the people.
I think what they’re saying is that we subsidize losses for the rich, but for citizens it’s rugged individualism. Bootstraps and such. The tax dollars are always there to bail out companies or to fight wars, but not to serve the needs of the people.