カニ風 [she/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agoa very emphatic answerlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1533arrow-down129
arrow-up1504arrow-down1imagea very emphatic answerlemmy.blahaj.zoneカニ風 [she/they]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-square💡𝚂𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇 𝙰𝗉𝗉𝗌📱linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·6 months ago The rules and the acronyms describe different things. No, they don’t. If you have to make more rules to say M and D are the same, I didn’t make more rules - that’s the existing rules. Here’s one of many graphics on the topic which are easy to find on the internet… …that’s one of the two examples you used? Yes. Did you try looking for one and ramping it up to the most difficult level? I’m guessing not. IT IS AMBIGUOUS IN THIS POST No, it isn’t. Division before subtraction, always. ALL EXAMPLES I HAVE SHOWN None of those have been ambiguous either, as I have pointed out. That is the problem at hand. The problem is people not obeying the rules of Maths. There is no real problem solving in trying to decipher poorly written shit It’s not poorly written. It’s written the exact way you’d find it in any Maths textbook.
No, they don’t.
I didn’t make more rules - that’s the existing rules. Here’s one of many graphics on the topic which are easy to find on the internet…
Yes. Did you try looking for one and ramping it up to the most difficult level? I’m guessing not.
No, it isn’t. Division before subtraction, always.
None of those have been ambiguous either, as I have pointed out.
The problem is people not obeying the rules of Maths.
It’s not poorly written. It’s written the exact way you’d find it in any Maths textbook.