I found out that xubuntu spams users including me, which to me is a no go.

I’m looking for a linux based ad free distro that lets me work with libreoffice, vlc, tbb, transmission, okular, pdfarranger, hexchat, gimp and ocr.

I’m going to use it to edit text, watch movies, download multimedia, chat and edit audio with audacity.

it’s not going to be a server and I’d like to work with the terminal as much as possible. At the same time, I’m a newbie.

  • @[email protected]
    1•1 month ago

    Stable means randomly cut off package updates.

    Continuous testing and integration is the best way for normal usage. With the iterations “bleeding edge” “fresh” “slightly tested” and “tested”

    • Possibly linuxEnglish
      1•1 month ago

      I disagree

      Fedora works way better than Arch ever will and requires much less upkeep

      • @[email protected]English
        1•1 month ago

        So if one wanted to run Arch but were of a similar opinion to you, then they could run Manjaro, which is also a semi-rolling release distro. It’s just on the monthly cadence.

        Everyone has their opinions on distros. Doesn’t mean any one opinion is wrong.

      • @[email protected]
        1•1 month ago

        Yes but Fedora is semi-rolling, something in the middle. This is about Ubuntu LTS, a traditional LTS version that cuts off packages on some random version.

        This should really only be done if

        1. The programs have a supported LTS/ESR version (Linux Kernel, Firefox, Thunderbird…) (btw GNOME, Chromium etc. dont have one)
        2. The packagers have a lot of time, the users pay money and the packagers actually make those versions as bug free and secure as possible, while keeping the feature freeze

        Ubuntu is trying to do 2. but have this separation in there to get money.

        • Possibly linuxEnglish
          1•1 month ago

          I would use Debian way before I would use Ubuntu. If 3 years of support isn’t enough I would use something RHEL