• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1229 days ago

    The other guy, the one with 34 felonies, has said he’d help expand the genocide.

    How do you miss these things?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -4
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      How do you so constantly and completely deflect any and all criticism to the other guy?

      I have the answer: because that’s how the two party system works to push you towards defending the genocide guy.

      Like, you get that the genocide support has a good chance of making him lose to the somehow-worse-genocide-guy, right? Like why aren’t you mad about that? Why do you constantly have to tell everyone to stop talking about the genocide support? You realise that’s a kind of genocide denial, right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        There are exactly two options here. It’s either the life long politician that’s actually been walking back support of the genocide, or the conman convict that has proudly stated he would be happy to make the shit even worse.

        Gee, I don’t know…

        I’m also not a one issue voter.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          There are exactly two options with voting. I assume you don’t see any others because your entire political imagination has been contracted to voting. I believe I anticipated your answer when I said that the two-party system has done this to your brain.

          And “walking back” support of the genocide is one way to say that he hasn’t actually removed any of the material support, and also a way to obscure the fact that the “walking back” has mostly been lip service.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              228 days ago

              Nobody.

              Two questions:

              1. Do you think I am somehow saying people shouldn’t vote for Biden? If so, can you explain where I have said that?

              2. Do you think the fact that Biden is the tactically superior choice means that we should not discuss that he is complicit in genocide?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                128 days ago
                1. Yes. Because that is the talking point for everyone that is obsessed with him sending arms to Israel.

                2. See response one.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  28 days ago
                  1. You’re begging the question.

                  2. So your focus on winning Biden the election necessitates genocide denial.
                    Not a denial that the genocide is happening, but a denial of holding the perpetrators accountable.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    28 days ago

                    You’re a broken record. Yes, we all know Biden and the American governments stance on Israel. You’re not helping anyone repeating the same tired argument over and over and over and over. No one is denying anything. Wtf.